Author Archive: Christopher Gonzalez

Using Animals to Test Makeup Products Is Wrong

Using Animals to Test Makeup Products

The practice of testing new products on animals has been used for both scientific and commercial interests. To some extent, the capitalist and commercial systems today are successful because of the animals that have been tested upon. No sector of the economy has benefitted more than the make-up and beauty markets. However, this practice raises many serious questions about the morals and ethics of animal testing.

Furthermore, it alluded to the argument that animal rights are violated when they are being tested upon. Despite the fact that a large part of the population indirectly depends on animal testing to get their products, animal testing should be condemned and even banned.

Many people expect animal testing for makeup products to be whether a rabbit looks better in red lipstick or blue lipstick. However, the reality for the animals is that these tests have nothing to do with looks or style. Instead, the tests are meant for chemical exposure and ingredient side effects. They include skin and eye irritation tests where products are put on naked skin or eyes without pain relief and often in restraint. Studies are also conducted to test long term health hazards or death due to overuse. These animals are often put to death at the end of testing and are certainly not given a dignified life or death. Not only do these facts about testing validate a cruel and uncompassionate life, they clearly are in conflict with animal rights. In fact, these tests also go again human rights if humans were the test subjects!

By now, enough testing and research has been conducted on a myriad of chemicals to know which ones are safe and cosmetic companies have enough material to use for releasing new products. The argument is that the very least we could do is stop testing now because there is no need to anymore. Yet, companies continually keep testing in search for the most cost efficient way to create products.

Furthermore, tests often become more variable and inconclusive at the expense of the animal. Lawmakers have already validated many chemicals known to be safe in order for companies to avoid legal trouble. The fact that companies have so many non-cruel options for makeup testing raises many questions as to how animal rights are not being more from

Finally, many have argued that humans often get tested to for medical and commercial research. Despite the fact that this is true, it does not validate the testing for animals. Humans are able to give consent to the testing they are about to go to. These tests are usually non-lethal and are often used to better the lives of fellow humans. Animal testing neither have consent nor are bettering the lives of other animals. They are simply for improving the looks of humans. Testing on animals for the commercial interests of humans is inhumane and violates animal rights.

Using Animals to Test Makeup Products

All animal lovers agree that animals should be treated with compassion and respect. The question of testing makeup products on animals is a very hotly debated one. Many argue that the pain and cruelty inflicted on animals during testing for the interests for human beings is a violation of their rights. If humans wish to have their rights respected, then cosmetic companies should begin to recognize that testing makeup products on animals is wrong.continue reading..

Is It Right Just To Breed Animals to Sell Them?

Breed Animals

Breeding animals has been used for both scientific and commercial purposes. The scientific research into breeding animals has largely advanced veterinary knowledge and medicine. However, it has also opened a new field in commercial business where some breed animals have been created for the sole purpose of selling. This is commonly seen in equestrian events and animal shows. In such events, it is essential that the participating animal is “perfect” and sometimes this can only be accomplished by breeding. The ethics behind breeding is often complicated and confusing. Is it right to breed animals for commercial interests or do animals also have rights that are violated?

One common argument against breeding animals is by assuming animals have the same rights as human beings. Put simply, if it is unethical to breed the “perfect” human, it should also be unethical to breed animals. Selective breeding often involved manipulating animals’ underlying bio-structures. Furthermore, by breeding animals for the “perfect” or “ideal” look, this alludes to the argument that the animal is a possession for humans rather than another living object with animal rights. There is no way of ever asking an animal if they would like for their offspring to be bred because we cannot communicate with them yet. In order to not violate their animal rights, we would at the very least need to get permission.get full details from

Another ethical concern with breeding animals is the eventual welfare of the offspring. While breeding has proven to sometimes improve resistance to diseases and illnesses, it can also permanently create painful side effects for life. This includes quicker growth rates, heart complications, and irregular growing patterns. Most breeders would argue that they are not trying to harm or induce pain to the animals but sometimes do not take into consideration that they might. The question of whether profit is worth the cost in animal rights should be answered by the breeder and not by the life of an animal.

Finally, a troubling fact for many animal shelters around the globe is that they are overfilled with unwanted animals. Many household cats and dogs are put to rest everyday because they have not met their “adoption deadline.” Animal rights activist groups have argued that breeding animals while their cousins are dying as unethical and cruel. One does not need to adopt the perfect kitten when there are many kittens waiting to be adopted. Furthermore, if there is more money earned when selling a more “perfect” animal, then it is evident that the animals are valued for their worth and not for their life.visit this link now!

Breed Animals

One fact that all animal lovers can agree is that animals should be treated with compassion and respect. The question of whether breeding is compassionate or respectful is a very hotly contested one. However, many arguments and facts have indicated that breeding is more harmful and cruel than non-breeding. If profit is the primary motivation for breeding, then there is a large ethical problem that must be confronted because animal rights cannot and should not be monetized. Furthermore, with the amount of animals waiting to be adopted, it only makes sense that breeding should be an act of the past.